Do I Have to Put Up With Sexual Harassment When My Job is Off the Books?

You go to work every day wondering whether you will be hit on, flirted with, or touched inappropriately. You know your status as an employee depends on how you respond to these sexual advances. But your job is off the books. Is there anything you can do about it? Can you file a sexual harassment claim if you are paid under the table? A hostile work environment can make every day a challenge, but if you are paid in cash you may face even bigger hurdles than your fully-employed counterparts. In today’s blog post, I will discuss the challenges faced by workers who get paid off the books in filing sexual harassment claims against their would-be employees.

Am I an Employee?

It may sound simple, but before you can file any kind of workplace discrimination claim, including sexual harassment, with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), you usually have to first be an employee. Independent contractors, partners, and other non-employee workers are not covered, so many employers looking to avoid payroll taxes will claim their “under the table” workers are either independent contractors or volunteers.

Whether you are an employee or not depends on the specific facts in your workplace. The more control your boss has over when and how you do your job, the more likely you are to be considered an employee. Your official title, or whether you are paid off the books, isn’t necessarily as important as the work you do and the level of supervision you receive. Instead courts will consider a number of factors like:

  • Who controls when, where, and how your work gets done?
  • How much skill or expertise is required to do the work?
  • Who supplies the equipment, tools, and materials to do the job?
  • Do you work on-site or remotely?
  • Can your boss assign you additional tasks?
  • Does your supervisor dictate your working hours or the length of the job?
  • How are you paid?
  • Do you hire your own support staff?
  • Is the work you do part of the employer’s regular business?
  • Is your employer a business?
  • Do you have your own business?
  • Do you receive benefits?
  • Does your employer pay taxes for your wages? (This can often work against “under the table” employees, but is only one factor among many.)
  • Can your boss fire you?
  • Do you and your boss consider you an employee?

Employee Protections Against Sexual Harassment

No matter whether you are paid cash or receive a W-2, as an employee, you are protected against sexual harassment in the workplace. That includes unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, unwanted physical or verbal advances, and other sexual comments. Offensive remarks about a person’s sex are also grounds for a sexual harassment claim. But before you can file a lawsuit, the harassment must either result in an adverse employment decision (like firing or being passed over for promotion), or be frequent or severe enough to create a hostile work environment.

Special Challenges Facing “Under the Table” Employees

As with undocumented workers, employees who are paid cash face special challenges when they need to report sexual harassment. Just like with undocumented workers, employers will often use your status as a cash worker as a threat to keep you from reporting workplace discrimination and sexual harassment.

Your employer may withhold employee status unless you comply with their sexual advances. Refusal to hire is itself an adverse employment action, which may expose your employer to employment discrimination claims. However, bringing such a claim when you have been paid under the table may have unexpected and unwanted consequences.

Your employer may also threaten to report you for tax fraud if you come forward. While illegal immigrants face consequences from the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), cash workers could see trouble from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Failing to report employment income is illegal. The IRS penalizes employers who fail to disclose their employees and pay payroll taxes. But it also punishes employees who have undisclosed income under tax fraud statutes. Because of this, filing a claim for sexual harassment by an undisclosed employer can be complicated. You will need the help of an experienced employment discrimination attorney, and possibly a tax lawyer, to navigate the process and ensure that all your rights are protected. Without an attorney who understands the particular challenges “under the table” employees face, you could accidentally land yourself in hot water with the IRS.

Fight Back Against Sexual Harassment

It is always hard to stand up to sexual harassment in the workplace. But when you are a cash worker, the risks are even greater. At Eisenberg & Baum, our employment discrimination attorneys have years of experience dealing with all kinds of sexual harassment claims. We understand the complexities and care needed to handle “under the table” cases. If you feel like your employer has created a hostile workplace or is conditioning your employment on sexual conduct, contact us. We will meet with you and help you understand and fight for your rights as an employee.

Women Passed Over for Promotions Because of Gender: Yes, It Still Happens

As a country, America has come a long way since World War II when women first began to enter the workforce. Today, women are represented in every industry, and continue to hold prominent positions in fields like medicine, law, and education. Yet, even as more women enter the board room and take on leadership roles, others are being left behind. Women across the country are being passed over for promotions because of their gender. They may not know that this is illegal or where to turn to get the recognition they deserve.

In today’s posting, we’ll talk about gender discrimination, and what women can do when they are passed over for promotions because of their sex. We’ll also talk about your rights as an employee and how to raise a claim for gender discrimination or sexual harassment. If you believe you have been passed over for a promotion because of your gender, contact Eisenberg & Baum. Our team of employment lawyers have years of experience handling discrimination claims. We can help you understand your rights and get you the remedy you need as a victim of discrimination.

Is It Discrimination If an Employer Does Not Promote an Employee Because of Her Gender?

Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and New York State and City Human Rights Laws protect women from gender discrimination in the workplace. These laws generally make it illegal for an employer anywhere in the United States to treat an employee differently at work because of a protected trait, like sex or gender. These laws apply whenever there is an adverse employment action against the victim of discrimination based on a protected characteristic. In particular, an employer is not permitted to base decisions about job assignments or promotions based on an employee’s sex, including gender identity, sexual orientation, or pregnancy.

The Sex Discrimination Lawsuit Against Dean Foods / Country Fresh

Sex discrimination continues to be a problem, even in the modern job market.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently filed a lawsuit against Country Fresh, a division of Dean Foods, located in Grand Rapids, Michigan. The lawsuit, which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, was brought on behalf of a female employee at the company’s Livonia, Michigan plant. She had worked in various production jobs in various parts of the plant and had accumulated decades of experience. In spite of all her hard work for the company, the employee was repeatedly bypassed for promotions in favor of male employees. The EEOC is asking the court to issue an injunction to keep Country Fresh from engaging in promotion discrimination in the future. If the lawsuit is successful, the employee could also be awarded significant financial damages.

Is It Sexual Harassment If an Employer Does Not Promote an Employee Because She Refuses Sexual Advances?

In some cases, gender discrimination happens because of stereotypes or other factors inherent to the gender. In others, women are being passed over for promotions because they refuse to play along with sexual harassment. Unfortunately, employees in some workplaces still face unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, offensive remarks about a person’s gender, and other verbal or physical sexual harassment. When a woman’s refusal to give in to these behaviors becomes grounds not to promote her, the employer has violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, as well as New York city and state laws.

Can an Employer Refuse to Promote an Employee for Reporting Gender Discrimination or Sexual Harassment?

Gender discrimination usually isn’t a secret. Co-workers often observe the adverse treatment of a victim. Unfortunately, fear of retaliation can keep concerned co-workers from speaking up, either internally or through official legal channels. Federal and state laws protect employees from retaliation for reporting gender discrimination or sexual harassment. Employees are protected whether they were victims of the discrimination or just a witness. Employees facing retaliation, including failure to promote, have the same options available as the victims of discrimination. Without this protection, employees would remain silent in the face of hostile workplaces and serious gender discrimination out of fear that they could be next.

How to Fight Back Against Gender Discrimination and Sexual Harassment

Women facing gender discrimination and sexual harassment in the workplace may feel like they are out of options. A hostile work environment can make it seem like there is nowhere to turn. When discrimination comes from a manager or supervisor, it may seem there is no safe way to complain. When that happens, we encourage you to contact an attorney. The employment discrimination attorneys at Eisenberg & Baum have years of experience dealing with gender discrimination and sexual harassment claims. We bill on a contingent fee basis, so you won’t have to pay us unless we win or settle your case.

Can I Sue My Employer for Unfair Treatment?

You’ve watched people of the same or lesser experience get promoted while you stay in the same position. You always get the weekend shift while your colleagues get the weekend off. You got fired because your boss had to let someone go and she liked you least. There are countless examples of actions at work you might consider unfair. But does that mean you have a legal claim against your employer? Unfair treatment at work can be demoralizing, but not all acts you might consider unfair or inequitable are actually grounds for a lawsuit. In today’s posting, we’ll talk about some of the common types of unfair treatment at work that can lead to a lawsuit against your employer.

At Will Employment

We should start by noting that employees in New York, like employees in most states, are considered to be employed “at will” by default. This means that an employee can generally be terminated from their job for any reason or no reason at all. Exceptions to this rule exist where specifically recognized under the law, such as where the termination violates an employment contract or a specific state or federal statute. While you may believe you have been fired from your job unreasonably or unfairly, unless your employer breached an employment contract or violated a specific law, you likely don’t have a legal claim.

Breach of Employment Contract

Although most states default to at-will employment, there are some situations in which the employer and employee enter into an agreement to govern the terms of their employment relationship, including the terms under which the employee may be fired. These are often used with executive level employees and, in addition to outlining the reasons for which an employee may be terminated, can include terms governing the employee’s pay and benefits, leave allowance, procedures for filing a grievance, and more. If an employer does not comply with the terms of the contract, for example by paying you less than required under the contract, you could have a breach of contract claim against your employer. Likewise, if you have an employment contract that specifically limits the reasons your employer can fire you, and your employer fires you for some reason not included in the agreement, you could have a wrongful termination claim.

Discrimination

Even if you do not have an employment contract in place, there may be other legal grounds for holding your employer accountable for unfair treatment. One of the most common areas of the law protecting employees from unfair treatment at work is in the area of employment discrimination. Federal and many state and local laws make it illegal for employers to discriminate against their employees on the basis of certain protected characteristics.

Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, pregnancy, age, religion, disability, and genetic information. State and local laws can protect an even broader group of workers from discrimination, like in New York where employers are also prohibited from discriminating against an employee on the basis of sexual orientation, marital status, gender identity, arrest and conviction record, military status or service, observance of Sabbath, political activities, unemployment status, and status as a victim of domestic violence. To learn more about discrimination claims in New York, read our recent blog posting entitled, “The Elements of an Employment Discrimination Claim in New York.”

Whistleblower Retaliation

Sometimes, unfair treatment at work can be a direct result of your decision to report illegal or unethical conduct by your employer. In that situation, your employer is retaliating against you, which can have the effect of discouraging you and other employees from stepping forward. Whistleblower laws have been enacted at the federal and state levels to help protect employees against retaliation when they report or take part in an investigation of certain types of activities. Reporting or assisting in an investigation of fraud, environmental violations, discrimination and other illegal activities by your employer or refusing to take part in an illegal activity can all trigger the protection of whistleblower laws.

Wage Claims

Employees in the United State also have some protections when it comes to their pay. The federal Fair Labor Standards Act establishes a minimum wage for covered workers in the United States. Some states, like New York, have established an even higher minimum wage. These laws also typically establish rules for overtime pay, requiring greater pay for overtime hours. Federal law and many state laws also require equal pay for equal work between men and women. Employers must compensate female and male employees equally where they are equally skilled and work in the same position. If you are not getting paid the basic wage required under the law, you can have a claim against your employer.

Are You Being Treated Unfairly at Work?

Not all unfair treatment at work is grounds for a lawsuit. Legal claims typically arise when the unfair treatment you’ve suffered violates a specific law, like federal and state discrimination and wage laws, or specific contract terms. If you have been treated unfairly at work and believe you may have a legal claim, contact Eisenberg & Baum. We have a group of very experienced employment discrimination attorneys who are ready to help you understand your claim and advise you of your rights under the law. Though we’re based in New York City, we have attorneys licensed in many states throughout the country and we can also become admitted pro hac vice with local counsel in other states where we are not currently admitted, so we likely can help no matter where you are. In discrimination and retaliation cases, we offer free initial consultations and bill on a contingent fee basis, so you won’t have to pay us unless we win or settle your case.

Lawyers for Discrimination Against Undocumented Workers

It is often said that undocumented workers in this country “live in the shadows.” They’re typically here for a reason: to make a better living for themselves and their families. But in doing that, they’ve risked violating United States law. They work in a wide variety of jobs, notably making up significant proportions of the employment base in industries like farming, cleaning and maintenance, and construction. Yet, undocumented workers live with a constant threat that some day they will be discovered and forced to leave this country. For this reason, they may be hesitant to speak up for themselves. Others may try to take advantage of their status, using it as a threat against undocumented workers in order to keep them from reporting illegal activity. In the employment world, one of the many concerns is that an employer may get the benefit of an undocumented worker’s labor but abuse their position and the worker’s status to justify unfair or even illegal treatment.

In today’s posting, we’ll talk about the legal rights of undocumented workers in fighting against discrimination at their job. We’ll also touch on the risks workers take if they raise the issue with the government or in court and the protections that are in place for them. If you believe you’re being discriminated against at work, no matter what your immigration or citizenship status, contact Eisenberg & Baum. Our employment lawyers have years of experience handling discrimination claims and can help you better understand your rights and remedies as a victim of discrimination.

Are Undocumented Workers Protected by Anti-Discrimination Laws?

We’ve talked a lot on our blog about the various anti-discrimination laws that protect employees from discrimination based on a wide variety of characteristics, including gender, age, race, religion and national origin. Federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination include Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Many states have their own employment discrimination laws as well, like New York State’s Human Rights Law. These laws generally make it illegal for an employer in the United States to treat an employee differently at work because of a protected trait. To learn more about the types of traits that are protected from discrimination, read our previous blog post entitled, “The Elements of an Employment Discrimination Claim in New York.”

Federal and State Discrimination Laws

Federal laws and New York State laws prohibiting discrimination generally extend to undocumented workers.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the EEOC), which is the federal agency in charge of enforcing laws like Title VII and the ADA, has made it clear that federal anti-discrimination laws apply to all employees in the United States, including those who may not be legally authorized to work here. There can be limits to the types of damages an undocumented worker can recover, at least under federal law, but generally undocumented workers have the same legal options for filing a discrimination claim as any other worker in this country.

Without this protection, employers, managers and fellow workers could take advantage of undocumented workers in ways that would be illegal if the worker were authorized to work in the U.S. Undocumented workers would be left with no ability to defend themselves against racial slurs, sexual harassment and other types of behavior the United States decided long ago do not belong in the workplace. Applying anti-discrimination laws equally to both authorized and unauthorized workers can also help remove any incentive an employer might have to hire unauthorized workers over their authorized counterparts in order to avoid legal oversight.

Is It Discrimination If An Employer Does Not Hire An Applicant Because They’re Undocumented?

Though anti-discrimination laws generally apply to undocumented workers, and many of those laws including Title VII prohibit discrimination against an employee based on their national origin, an employer may still refuse to hire a candidate or terminate an employee it discovers is not authorized to work in the United States. Immigration laws prohibit employers from knowingly employing unauthorized workers and can carry criminal sanctions for employers. Refusing to hire an applicant because they are not legally authorized to work in this country is distinct from refusing to hire an applicant because they were originally born in another country.

What Risks Do Undocumented Workers Face When Filing a Discrimination Complaint?

While the law may prohibit discrimination against undocumented workers to the same extent as authorized workers, undocumented workers may still have very important concerns about coming forward with their complaint. If they file a complaint with the EEOC or a lawsuit, will their employer or some government authority report them to the United States Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), ultimately leading to their removal from the country?

US Immigration Customs Enforcement ICEThere are no express guarantees for undocumented workers under the law. However, anti-discrimination laws do typically protect employees against retaliation by their employers and ICE has indicated in its own guidance that it does not want to get involved in employment disputes. Many of the same laws that protect individuals from workplace discrimination also protect employees from retaliation for opposing unlawful discrimination. This protection extends to employees who report the alleged discrimination as well as employees who simply participated in a discrimination investigation. If an employer reports or threatens to report an employee to ICE because the employee opposed workplace discrimination, the employer has likely violated the law.

ICE is also aware that employers might use an employee’s immigration status against them if they complain about discrimination or other illegal treatment at work. As part of its Special Agents Field Manual, ICE cautions its officials to beware of reports of unauthorized workers that could get the ICE involved in labor disputes like discrimination claims. Agents are instructed not to take action on reports that appear to be made in an attempt to squash a complaint or retaliate against an employee for exercising their legal rights without higher level review and approval.

Get Legal Help

If you’re an undocumented worker facing discrimination at work, we recommend contacting an attorney as soon as possible. An experienced attorney can help guide you through the legal hurdles and concerns that you may face, and will advise you on the best way forward to address the discrimination you’re facing while at the same time protecting you against r
etaliation from your employer.

Contact Eisenberg & Baum for a free initial consultation on your case. Though we’re based in New York City, we have attorneys licensed in many states throughout the country and we can also become admitted pro hac vice with local counsel in other states where we are not currently admitted, so we likely can help no matter where you are. In discrimination and retaliation cases, we offer free initial consultations and bill on a contingent fee basis, so you won’t have to pay us unless we win or settle your case.

Elements of an Employment Discrimination Claim in New York

We’ve talked about many types of employment discrimination in past blog posts, from sexual harassment to discrimination against the deaf and hard of hearing. There are many other grounds for discrimination claims for employees in New York, though most of those grounds share the same general theories and elements. If you believe you’ve been the victim of discrimination in the workplace, but aren’t quite sure whether you have a legal claim, it’s best to first understand the basics of anti-discrimination law and what it protects to determine if your legal rights may have been violated. At Eisenberg & Baum, we have decades of experience handling employment discrimination claims of all sorts. In today’s post, we’ll talk about two of the more common theories of employment discrimination and the elements that are common to those theories under local, state and federal law. If, after reading this, you’d like to understand more about the law and how it might apply to your own situation, please contact us.

Types of Employment Discrimination Claims

There are a variety of federal, state and local laws that protect employees from discrimination at work here in New York. Federal anti-discrimination laws include Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA),and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. New York State and New York City each have their own employment discrimination laws, known as “Human Rights Laws.”

We’ll focus on two of the more common theories of discrimination underlying these laws: disparate treatment and harassment. Disparate treatment claims arise when an employee is treated differently at work because of some protected characteristic. Harassment claims, on the other hand, typically arise when an employee suffers unwelcome conduct based on a protected characteristic and either the employee had to endure the conduct in order to keep their job or the conduct created a hostile work environment.

Disparate Treatment Claims

To prove an employment discrimination claim based on the disparate treatment theory, the employee will need to demonstrate two key things:

  1. They are a member of a protected class, and
  2. Their employer took some adverse employment action against them because of that protected characteristic.

Protected Classes

Federal, state and local anti-discrimination laws protect against particular types of discrimination based on specific classes and characteristics. Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act, for instance, protects employees from discrimination based on their sex, race, color, national origin, and religion. The ADA protects employees from discrimination based on a “disability,” which under the law can include any physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity, such as deafness. New York State and New York City Human Rights Laws protect many of the same classes and characteristics as federal laws, but also extend to others characteristics not covered under federal law including sexual orientation, marital status, gender identity, arrest and conviction record, military status or service, observance of Sabbath, political activities, unemployment status, and status as a victim of domestic violence. Any employee claiming they were treated unfairly under anti-discrimination laws will need to demonstrate their status under a category protected from discrimination under one of these laws.

Adverse Action

The next step for a plaintiff in a disparate treatment case is providing some evidence that they faced adverse employment action as a result of their membership in the protected class. Adverse action could include an active decision by the employer, such as firing or demoting an employee, or a passive decision such as not hiring a job applicant or passing an employee over for promotion.

The employee must provide some evidence linking the employment action to the employee’s protected characteristic. The evidence could be direct (for example, an employee’s manager telling her that the company has a policy of not promoting women) or, as is often the case, circumstantial. Circumstantial evidence, as the name suggests, is evidence from which you can infer an element of a claim based on the circumstances. In the context of a disparate treatment case, circumstantial evidence could include evidence that the employer treated similarly situated employees that weren’t part of the protected class more favorably (for example, men were promoted while women of similar ability were not).

Once an employee can provide evidence of the link between the adverse action they suffered and their protected characteristic, the burden then shifts to the employer to provide some legitimate reason for taking the employment action. This is a fairly low hurdle for the employer because they don’t necessarily need to prove they didn’t discriminate against the employee, they just need to produce some evidence of a non-discriminatory reason for their action. For example, the employer might argue the employee was not fully qualified for the job or promotion. If an employer is able to produce some evidence of a legitimate reason for the adverse action, then the employee will need to counter the employer’s claim with evidence that the true reason for the adverse action was discriminatory. The judge or jury will ultimately weigh the evidence provided by the parties and decide who should prevail.

Harassment Claims

Another common basis for employment discrimination claims is harassment. Generally, to prevail under a harassment theory of discrimination, an employee must be able to show:

  1. They were subjected to unwelcome conduct
  2. as a result of their membership in a protected class, and
  3. they had to endure the conduct in order to keep their job or the conduct created a hostile work environment.

We’ll discuss each of these elements briefly below. For a more thorough discussion of harassment claims, check out our posting entitled, “Definition of Harassment.”

Unwelcome Conduct

The unwelcome conduct contributing to the harassment can be physical, verbal or some combination of conduct, and can be carried out by supervisors, co-workers or third parties like customers and vendors. The employee must show not only that such harassing conduct occurred, but also that they did not consider it welcome. In other words, consensual conduct between willing participants cannot be grounds for a harassment claim.

Protected Classes

The protected classes we talk about in the context of harassment clai
ms are the same as we discussed above in the context of disparate treatment claims. Like a disparate treatment claim, an employee claiming harassment under federal law or New York State or City law must show a link between the unwanted conduct and the employee’s membership in the protected class. In some cases, that link between harassment and a protected characteristic will be very apparent, such as in a sexual harassment case where a male supervisor requires a female employee to engage in sexual acts. In other situations, the link between the harassment and the protected characteristic may be less obvious and require more evidence of the harasser’s intent.

Severe and Pervasive

Finally, in order to recover on a harassment claim under federal or New York State laws, the employee must show that the harassing conduct was either a condition of continued employment or was so severe or pervasive that it created an environment a reasonable person would find intimidating, hostile, or abusive (also known as a hostile work environment). Typically, in order to meet the severe and pervasive requirement, an employee would need to show a pattern of harassment, though that’s not always the case. A single incident could theoretically be egregious enough to meet this requirement. Note, the New York City Human Rights Law does not include this requirement for harassment claims.

Get More Information

If you believe you have been discriminated against at work, please contact us. We can discuss the merits of your case and advise you on your next steps. We offer free initial consultations for sexual harassment claims and bill on a contingent fee basis, so you won’t have to pay us unless we win or settle your case.

​Can a Woman Sexually Harass Another Woman?

When we talk about sexual harassment in the workplace, we often talk in terms of men harassing women. It may be the example that first comes to your mind when we say “sexual harassment,” and it is the example we use most often when discussing the topic. But does that mean the law prohibits only men from sexually harassing women? Not at all. In fact, the law has been interpreted to prohibit sexual harassment by men and women against people of the same and opposite gender.

In today’s posting we’ll talk about how the law on sexual harassment has been applied to situations where both the harasser and victim are the same gender. If you have questions about your own sexual harassment case, please contact Eisenberg & Baum. We’re based in New York City and have attorneys licensed in many states throughout the country; we can also become admitted pro hac vice with local counsel in other states where we are not currently admitted, so we likely can help you understand your sexual harassment case no matter where you are.

The Development of Same-Sex Sexual Harassment Law

We’ve noted before that many federal, state and local laws prohibit sexual harassment in the workplace on the grounds that such harassment is considered gender discrimination. The federal law that has been interpreted to prohibit sexual harassment in the workplace is Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Though we often cite this law as prohibiting sexual harassment, the words “sexual harassment” don’t actually appear in the text of the law. Instead, Title VII states more broadly, “[i]t shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer . . . to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s … sex… .” The concept of sexual harassment as a form of sex discrimination developed over time after the enactment of Title VII as more women entered the workplace and the women’s liberation movement gained political and legal strength. The first United States Supreme Court decision acknowledging sexual harassment as a legal cause of action under Title VII came in 1986 with the case of Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson. That case presented what would now be seen as a classic example of sexual harassment in which a female employee was coerced into participating in sexual acts by her male boss.

Over ten years after the Supreme Court’s decision in Meritor, the Supreme Court considered the question of whether Title VII could apply when the harasser and victim are the same gender. In that case, Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., a male worker on an offshore oil platform complained about the harassing conduct of several male co-workers who allegedly engaged in both verbal and physical sexual conduct with him. The Court noted that Title VII protects both men and women from discrimination based on their sex, and held that sexual harassment by someone of the same gender can be just as illegal as harassment by a member of the opposite sex.

Following the opinion in Oncale, the key issue in same-sex sexual harassment cases is whether the harassment occurred “because of” the victim’s gender. If for example, the victim can show that the harasser harassed only members of their own gender and not the opposite gender, a court could infer that the harassment was motivated by the victim’s gender. If, on the other hand, the evidence shows that the harasser treated both men and women in the workplace the same, equally harassing both, the victim could have difficulty showing that they were harassed because of their particular sex.

Examples of Same-Sex Sexual Harassment Cases

Since the Oncale decision, there have been a number of sexual harassment cases based on same-sex harassment. In March of this year, the EEOC, the federal agency in charge of enforcing Title VII, announced it filed a lawsuit against a wireless retailer, ABC Phones of North Carolina, Inc., based on same-sex sexual harassment. The EEOC alleges that a female sales associate with the company was sexually harassed by a female colleague. The victim reported the conduct, which included both inappropriate comments and touching, to her management, but the conduct continued. The EEOC is seeking damages on the victim’s behalf, and noted in a press release that “‘[s]exual harassment is illegal, regardless of whether the harasser is female or male, or the same or opposite gender as the victim.’”

In 2014, the EEOC reached a settlement with Wells Fargo Bank in a similar case. There, several female bank tellers complained that a female manager and a female co-worker had harassed them both verbally and physically. Among other things, the harassers in that case allegedly made sexually explicit comments and gestures to the female tellers, suggested they wear provocative clothing to work, and inappropriately touched them. Again, the victims in the case reported the harassment to their employer, but the harassment did not stop. Wells Fargo settled the case with the EEOC, agreeing to pay the victims $290,000 in damages and to take preventative steps to avoid similar situations in the future.

You Don’t Have to Tolerate Sexual Harassment by Anyone

Sexual harassment can be committed by almost anyone in the workplace, male or female, manager, co-worker or customer. Women can sexually harass other women and men can sexually harass other men. If you believe you are being sexually harassed at work, no matter who is harassing you, we encourage you to contact an attorney. The attorneys at Eisenberg & Baum have years of experience handling a wide variety of sexual harassment cases and are ready to help you. We offer free initial consultations for sexual harassment claims and bill on a contingent fee basis, so you won’t have to pay us unless we win or settle your case.

Clothing Maker FYC International to Pay $80,000 for Sexual Harassment of Women

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently announced a settlement with clothing manufacturer, FYC International. Though the Connecticut based clothing manufacturer has discontinued operations, the EEOC still held it accountable for what three female employees alleged was a hostile and sexually demeaning environment in its warehouses. The extensive allegations of sexual harassment brought by the female employees provide a textbook example of sexual harassment in the workplace and should serve as a warning for other employers and employees still maintaining a work environment where blatant sexual conduct toward women is normal.

In this posting we’ll discuss the allegations in the FYC case, the EEOC’s enforcement actions and the terms of the settlement in the case. If you’d like to talk with a lawyer about how sexual harassment laws and complaint processes might apply in your own case, please contact Eisenberg & Baum.

The Claims Against FYC International

The female warehouse employees who raised the claim against FYC alleged they were subjected to sexual harassment by their male warehouse manager and male co-workers since at least 2007. For those looking at the case from the outside, the allegations demonstrate many of the common sources and types of sexual harassment that can lead to a legal claim.

What is Sexual Harassment?

As we’ve discussed before, sexual harassment is a form of gender discrimination that exists when an employee is subjected to unwelcome sexual conduct that either creates a hostile work environment or is used a basis for employment decisions. In the FYC case, the female employees alleged that the sexually-oriented conduct of their manager and co-workers created a hostile work environment for them. For more background on hostile work environment claims, read our prior posting “What is a ‘Hostile Work Environment?’

Who Committed the Harassment?

Harassment in the workplace can come from any number of sources, including management, co-workers, clients and vendors. In the FYC case, the victims alleged that the harassment came from two sources, starting with the warehouse manager and then spreading to male co-workers. The manager is alleged to have created the environment at work that not only could have been alleged to be harassing on its own, but also apparently encouraged other employees to act in sexually offensive ways toward female employees.

How Were the Employees Harassed?

Sexual harassment can come in many different forms, from verbal to physical conduct. In the FYC case, the female employees alleged they were subjected to all types of unwanted sexual conduct which led to the hostile environment. The warehouse manager himself allegedly made comments about female employees’ bodies, propositioned them for sex, and grabbed and touched them. According to the complainants, other male employees followed the manager’s example by displaying pornographic photographs at work, making their own sexual remarks to female employees, and discussing sexual acts in the open. This combination of physical and verbal conduct from various levels of employees at the FYC warehouses created a discriminatory environment, according to female employees.

The EEOC Process

The employees took their complaint to the EEOC, the federal agency in charge of enforcing the federal law that prohibits gender discrimination in the workplace, Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964. In cases brought to the EEOC, the agency will often investigate and attempt to resolve the dispute between the parties. Where it finds the employer violated the law and the employer is unwilling to settle the case, the EEOC may decide to file a lawsuit directly against the employer on behalf of the employees.

In the FYC case, the EEOC investigated the claim and found reasonable cause to believe sexual harassment had occurred against female employees at FYC’s warehouses. The EEOC attempted to settle with FYC before bringing formal legal action, but the FYC rejected those attempts. In September 2014, the EEOC brought a lawsuit against FYC in federal court in Connecticut seeking both money damages for the employees and an injunction that would prohibit FYC from engaging in further sexual harassment of its employees.

Settlement Terms

With the real threat of a trial now facing it, FYC came to the negotiating table with the EEOC. In March of this year, the EEOC announced it had reached a settlement with the employer over the sexual harassment claims. Under the terms of the settlement, FYC will pay $80,000 in damages to the three female employees who raised the complaint with the EEOC. The EEOC also announced future protective measures FYC agreed to implement should it continue to do business, including hiring an independent compliance official, to ensure the incidents of sexual harassment stop.

You Have Legal Options

According to the female employees at FYC’s warehouses, they had been subjected to various forms of sexual harassment for over five years before they complained to the EEOC. The harassment may have started with the warehouse manager, but with this example from leadership, other men in the warehouse allegedly followed. Surrounded by this sexually explicit and aggressive behavior at all levels, the complainants could easily have come to accept this environment as a part of their job. They did not.

No matter who is harassing you at work and how long it has been going on, you can always seek legal help. If you believe you’ve been subjected to sexual harassment at work, please contact Eisenberg & Baum. Our attorneys have decades of experience handling sexual harassment cases in New York and are ready to help you with your claim. We offer free initial consultations for sexual harassment claims and bill on a contingent fee basis, so you won’t have to pay us unless we win or settle your case.

What Is Quid Pro Quo Sexual Harassment?

As if understanding the law isn’t hard enough, there are times when you have to speak Latin to understand what is going on. Because our legal system traces some of its roots back to ancient Rome, you’ll often come across Latin phrases in the law like caveat emptor, ex parte, and habeas corpus. In the employment discrimination law area, one of the most important Latin phrases to understand is “quid pro quo.” Quid pro quo translates roughly to “something for something,” and in the context of sexual harassment, it is used as a short-hand way of referring to those claims where employment decisions are conditioned on an employee’s submitting to sexually harassing conduct.

In today’s posting, we’ll talk about what a quid pro quo sexual harassment claim involves and provide a few examples of what these types of claims look like. If you’d like to understand more about these types of sexual harassment claims and how they might apply in your own case, please contact us.

Elements of a Quid Pro Quo Sexual Harassment Claim

As we’ve discussed in prior posts, sexual harassment is a form of gender discrimination that is illegal under federal law as well as many state and local laws. All sexual harassment claims involve some form of unwelcome sexual conduct. From there, sexual harassment claims typically fall into two categories: (1) hostile work environment claims and (2) quid pro quo claims. For more information about hostile work environment claims, check out our posting, “What is a ‘Hostile Work Environment’?”

In quid pro quo claims, a person in a supervisory capacity subjects an employee to unwanted sexual conduct in exchange for some beneficial employment action.

Who Is the Harasser in a Quid Pro Quo Claim?

The harasser in a quid pro quo claim typically must have some supervisory authority over the victim. Because the basis of a quid pro quo claim is that an employee is given some employment benefit in return for submitting to sexual conduct, the harasser must be someone who is in a position to provide that benefit to the employee. That’s not to say that sexual harassment by co-workers, contractors or customers can’t also create a legal claim, but those situations more often fall within the hostile work environment theory of sexual harassment.

What Type of Conduct is Involved in a Quid Pro Quo Claim?

The harasser in a quid pro quo sexual harassment claim must subject the victim to unwanted sexual conduct. The key pieces to this element are that the conduct must have been of a sexual nature and must have been unwanted by the victim. The conduct can be verbal or physical, with a supervisor subjecting the employee to anything from offensive jokes to physical groping and sexual acts in return for some beneficial employment action.

Whether the conduct was unwanted is determined by the facts around the harassment, and specifically courts will look at the victim’s own conduct during the time of the harassment. Even if the victim ultimately participated in the act, it can still be considered unwanted depending on the employee’s other actions surrounding the event, including whether the employee objected to the conduct either directly to the harasser or otherwise through their employer.

What Types of Employment Actions Are Typically Taken?

As part of a quid pro quo sexual harassment claim, the supervisor must have conditioned a job benefit or made an employment decision based on the victim’s submission to or rejection of the unwanted sexual conduct. Examples of the types of employment actions typically involved in a quid pro quo claim include hiring, firing, promotions, demotions, and decisions about compensation. The supervisor does not have to explicitly offer the employment benefit at the time of the harassing conduct, so long as the facts show that an employee’s acceptance or rejection of the sexual conduct was later used as part of the employment decision.

Examples of Quid Pro Quo Sexual Harassment

Quid pro quo claims can arise any time, starting with hiring decisions and ending with termination. For example, a job candidate could come in for an interview with the head of the department in which she would be working, and during the interview, the department head proceeds to grope the candidate and ask her “How badly do you want this job?”

Next, take the example of an employee who has been continually subjected by her supervisor to remarks about her body and sexual jokes. The employee tells her supervisor to stop and has reported his actions up the chain. When it comes time for annual performance reviews and promotions, the supervisor gives the employee a bad review and passes her over for promotion because she did not “play along” with him.

Another example could be an employee on a business trip with his supervisor. While staying at the same hotel, the supervisor comes to his room to talk about a presentation they are preparing to give but quickly starts making sexual advances on the employee. The employee steps away from his boss and asks her to leave his room. The supervisor responds, “Come on. I’d hate to see you lose your job.”

The employees in each of these examples could have a quid pro quo sexual harassment claim against their employer, though the incidents happened at different times in the employment process, in different places, and with differing degrees of explicitness on the part of the supervisor.

Contact an Attorney

If you suspect you’ve been the victim of quid pro quo sexual harassment, we encourage you to contact an attorney immediately. Quid pro quo cases often are not as clear as the examples above, and it can take an experienced sexual harassment attorney to help you understand the strength of your claims and your legal options. At Eisenberg & Baum, our attorneys have decades of experience handling sexual harassment cases in New York and are ready to help you with your claim. We offer free initial consultations for sexual harassment claims and bill on a contingent fee basis, so you won’t have to pay us unless we win or settle your case.

When Can You Sue for Workplace Harassment?

People can make a big difference in how much you enjoy your job and how motivated you are to do it. You interact with co-workers, managers, vendors and clients on a daily basis, and when those working relationships really work, it’s a wonderful thing. When they don’t work, however, things can turn sour. A working relationship, like any relationship in life, can range from perfectly friendly and harmonious to belligerent and hostile. When you have harassing work relationships, it can create a poisonous work environment that could damage not only your motivation and performance at work but could seep into your personal life as well. If you’re experiencing this kind of work environment, you no doubt want a way out and you might be wondering, “Do I have a legal claim to stop the harassment I’m suffering at work and remedy that damages it has done?”

Not all difficult working relationships and harassing activity lead to a legal claim. Simply because you don’t get along with a co-worker or manager doesn’t mean you are being “harassed” as that term is used in the law. In this posting, we’ll talk about when harassment at work rises to the level of a legal claim as well as the deadlines you should be aware of if you have such a claim. Eisenberg & Baum has years of experience handling workplace harassment cases. If you’d like to understand more about whether you have a legal cause of action for harassment you’ve been suffering at work, please contact us.

Elements of a Workplace Harassment Claim

In legal terms, workplace harassment is often associated with sexual harassment, a form of gender discrimination. However, workplace harassment can be the basis for a number of different employment discrimination claims, not just gender. The common elements to a legal harassment claim include:

  1. an employee suffers unwelcome conduct,
  2. the conduct is based on a protected trait, and
  3. either the employee has to endure the conduct in order to keep their job or the conduct is so severe and pervasive it creates a hostile work environment.

We’ll explain each of these elements in more detail below. If you’d like to read about specific examples of harassment claims, take a look at our prior posting, “Common Examples of Workplace Harassment.”

What Is Unwelcome Conduct?

To prove a workplace harassment claim, you must be able to show that you were subjected to some form of harassing conduct and that the conduct was not welcomed on your part. Harassing conduct can come in any number of different forms, from verbal conduct like jokes, insults, taunting or slurs, to physical conduct like touching, groping and pushing. Your response in the face of this conduct will help demonstrate whether it was unwelcomed. Did you object at the time of the behavior, walk away or report the incident to a supervisor? Or, did you join in the joking with your own off-color jokes?

Is the Employee Part of a Protected Class?

As a form of discrimination, a harassment claim must also be based on some sort of legally protected classification. Harassing conduct, on its own, isn’t enough to create a legal claim. Only certain traits or characteristics are protected from harassment under the law. Under federal law, those traits include race, color, national origin, gender, pregnancy, age, religion, disability, and genetic information. Many state and local governments have enacted similar anti-discrimination laws, like New York State’s Human Rights Law, which prohibits discrimination on grounds similar to those protected under federal law as well as sexual orientation, marital status, gender identity, arrest and conviction record, military status or service, observance of Sabbath, political activities, unemployment status, and status as a victim of domestic violence.

Quid Pro Quo or Hostile Work Environment

Finally, in order to have a harassment claim under the law, the employee must be able to show either: (1) they were required to endure the harassing conduct as a condition of their employment or (2) the harassing conduct created a hostile work environment. When an employee is required to endure harassing behavior as a condition of their employment, this is known as a “quid pro quo” claim. An example of a quid pro quo claim would be if a supervisor subjected one of their employees to sexual advances and touching and threatened to fire the employee if they objected.

More common than this explicit exchange of harassment for continued employment, though, is the situation where harassing conduct creates a hostile work environment for the employee. A hostile work environment exists when the harassment is so severe or pervasive that it creates an environment a reasonable person would find intimidating, hostile or abusive. Hostile work environments are typically created through a pattern of harassment rather than a single incident. The law will look at the conduct from the point of view of a reasonable person in the employee’s position to determine whether it was severe and pervasive enough to create a hostile environment.

How Long Do You Have to File a Harassment Lawsuit?

If you do believe you’re the victim of harassment at work and want to pursue a legal claim, you should be aware that the law imposes deadlines on when you can file a legal claim. These deadlines are called “statutes of limitations.” As we’ve discussed before in our posting entitled, “Statute of Limitations for Sexual Harassment Claims,” different deadlines apply depending on where you file your claim, whether you file a claim with an administrative agency like the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which has a deadline of 300 calendar days from the date of harassment, or in state court like New York, which generally gives claimants three years from the date of harassment to file a claim. The sooner you can reach out to an attorney to talk about your claim, the better.

Get Legal Help With Your Harassment Claim

If you’d like to discuss a harassment claim with an attorney, please contact Eisenberg & Baum. We can advise you on the merits of your claim under state and federal discrimination laws and help you sort through the various options and deadlines for filing your claim. We’re based in New York City and have attorneys licensed in many states throughout the country; we can also become admitted pro hac vice with local counsel in other states where we are not currently admitted, so we can help you understand your own workplace harassment case no matter where you are. We offer free initial consultations for employment discrimination claims and bill on a contingent fee basis, so you won’t have to pay us unless we win or settle your case.

Employee Lawsuit Against Memphis Cheddar’s Settled for $450,000

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently settled a sexual harassment lawsuit against Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC, franchisee of a Cheddar’s restaurant in Memphis, Tennessee. The allegations in the lawsuit reflect a reality in the restaurant industry that, unfortunately, is all too common. According to a report released in 2014 by The Restaurant Opportunities Centers United and Forward Together, “sexual harassment in restaurants is widespread and is experienced by all types of workers.” The report was based on a survey of 688 current and former restaurant workers across 39 states who were asked questions about their experience with sexual conduct at work. Roughly two-thirds of female respondents reported having experienced some form of sexual harassment by management. The survey further found that incidents of sexual harassment by co-workers and customers were even higher.

The EEOC’s case against the Memphis Cheddar’s franchise is indicative of the many charges it receives each year from restaurant workers. In this posting, we’ll summarize the allegations in the EEOC’s case against the Cheddar’s franchise and the terms of the parties’ settlement. If you’ve experienced sexual harassment at work and would like to discuss your legal options, please contact Eisenberg & Baum. We have an experienced group of New York sexual harassment attorneys who are ready to help and advocate on your behalf.

The EEOC’s Allegations

The EEOC’s lawsuit, filed in federal court in Tennessee, alleged that female employees of the Cheddar’s restaurant had been subjected to a hostile work environment through sexual harassment by management. Sexual harassment is a form of gender discrimination and a violation of Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act. As we discussed in our prior blog posting, “What is a ‘Hostile Work Environment’?,” a hostile work environment is a type of employment discrimination claim often used in sexual harassment cases. In order to prove a sexual harassment claim based on a hostile work environment, an employee must show they experienced unwelcome sexual conduct and that the conduct was so severe or pervasive it affected the terms of their employment.

In the Cheddar’s case, the EEOC brought the hostile work environment claim on behalf of the alleged victims, contending that the restaurant allowed managers to subject female employees to a number of different types of sexual conduct, including touching, requests for sexual favors and inappropriate comments. Though the restaurant apparently had a sexual harassment policy in place, the EEOC indicated it failed to properly enforce that policy when female employees complained about the inappropriate conduct.

Terms of the Settlement

In February, the EEOC announced it had reached a settlement with the Cheddar’s franchise. The restaurant agreed to pay $450,000 in damages to 15 individuals. In addition, the restaurant agreed to take affirmative steps to address the work environment in its restaurant, including:

  • conducting sexual harassment training,
  • maintaining workplace cameras,
  • monitoring workplace behavior,
  • notifying its employees of the settlement, and
  • reporting future sexual harassment incidents to the EEOC for three years.

This mixture of monetary damages and affirmative relief is standard in many EEOC settlements, as it helps both remedy damage done to victims and avoid future incidents. To learn more about the types of remedies that can be available in sexual harassment cases, check out our prior posting, “What Are My Remedies if I Sue for Discrimination at My Job?”

Get Legal Help

Working in a restaurant environment can be hard, made only harder by sexual harassment from managers, coworkers and customers. If you’ve been the victim of sexual harassment at your job, please contact us. We can discuss the merits of your case and advise you on the next steps, whether that is filing a charge with the EEOC or pursuing other legal options. We offer free initial consultations for sexual harassment claims and bill on a contingent fee basis, so you won’t have to pay us unless we win or settle your case.