Posts

Fox News Reporters Gretchen Carlson, Andrea Tantaros File Sexual Harassment Lawsuits

Fox News Sexual Harassment LawsuitsIf you are a skilled professional in a lucrative position, it may seem like sexual harassment could never happen to you. But recent lawsuits by reporters Gretchen Carlson and Andrea Tantaros against their former employer Fox News show that sexual harassment claims can happen in any industry, at any level.

In this blog post, I will review the sexual harassment complaint of Gretchen Carlson and news reports of the lawsuit of Andrea Tantaros. I will explain how sexual harassment claims can occur in any workplace, and what to do if it happens to you.

What Sexual Harassment Looks Like in Professional Spaces

When you think about sexual harassment, you may imagine a blue collar working environment filed with sexual innuendo, unwanted physical contact, and inappropriate advances. But that kind of behavior isn’t limited to the shop or the assembly line. Sexual harassment can happen anywhere, even in professional spaces.

Title VII of the U.S. Civil Rights Act prohibits all kinds of sexual harassment. At the federal level, that includes any unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and verbal or physical harassment. It also includes remarks about a person’s sex more generally. Before you can file a sexual harassment lawsuit under the federal law, the conduct must either result in an adverse employment decision (like firing, demotion, or refusal to hire), or amount to a pattern creating a hostile work environment.

Depending on where you live, you may be entitled to even more protection at the state and local levels. The New York City Human Rights Ordinance prohibits any discriminatory harassment or violence based on gender or sex. While verbal harassment still requires a pattern of behavior, the standard for when hostility is enough for a legal remedy is far lower.

In professional spaces and public-facing industries sexual harassment often happens behind closed doors. Forward advances are often paired with more subtle public-facing forms of discrimination, like the reassignment of duties, or dis-empowering statements. This can make it harder to show the pattern of discrimination needed to meet legal thresholds.

Gretchen Carlson’s Sexual Harassment Complaint Against Fox News

In July, 2016, reporter Gretchen Carlson publicly announced she was filing a sexual harassment suit against her former employer, Fox News and its chairman Roger Ailes. The complaint, which was filed on July 6, 2016 in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Bergen County, outlines a pattern of sexual harassment and retaliation by Ailes and fellow coworkers. The harassment culminated in Carlson’s contract not being renewed despite strong employment benchmarks. Carlson alleges that:

  • Ailes told her “I think you and I should have had a sexual relationship a long time ago and then you’d be good and better and I’d be good and better.” He added “sometimes problems are easier to solve” that way.
  • Ailes described Carlson as a “man hater” and a “killer” who was trying to “show up the boys”.
  • Ailes repeatedly made sexual advances toward Carlson, which she refused.
  • Ailes made inappropriate requests regarding her choices of clothing.
  • Carlson’s co-host, Steve Doocy created a hostile work environment by treating her in a sexist and condescending way on and off the air.
  • After Carlson complained about Doocy’s discrimination, Ailes retaliated against her by demoting her, reducing her pay, reassigning her to a less desirable time slot, assigning her fewer political interviews, and providing her less support than other reporters.
  • Carlson was ultimately fired on June 23, 2016, as a result of the discrimination and in retaliation for her complaints.

As often happens in wrongful termination cases, Fox News has stated that Carlson was fired for poor work performance. However, 21st Century Fox (the parent company for Fox News) launched an independent investigation that eventually caused Ailes to resign as chairman. The lawsuit is ongoing.

Andrea Tantaros Files Sexual Harassment Charges

Less than 6 weeks after Gretchen Carlson’s case hit the press, Fox News has found itself facing a second sexual harassment lawsuit, this time by former host Andrea Tantaros in Manhattan State Supreme Court. Tantaros is suing William Shine, who took over as co-president after Ailes resigned, and other top executives. Her suit echoes many of the same allegations raised by Carlson. Her complaint states:

“Fox News masquerades as a defender of traditional family values, but behind the scenes, it operates like a sex-fueled, Playboy Mansion-like cult, steeped in intimidation, indecency and misogyny.”

Tantaros asserts that Ailes acted with the support of many of Fox News’ senior staff, who allowed Ailes to silence her and others through systematic threats, humiliation, and retaliation.

What to Do If You Are Facing Sexual Harassment at Work

All together, 7 women have come forward alleging sexual harassment claims against Ailes over the past 30 years. If it can happen in a major news organization, it can happen anywhere. But if you aren’t a reporter like Carlson and Tantaros, it might be hard to know what to do about it. Here are a few suggestions:

  • Keep a log of sexual harassment activities. Whether it is in a notebook, a computer file, or even a pad of paper, a day-by-day account of what’s happening in your workplace can help show the pattern of behavior needed to make your case.
  • File formal complaints with HR. Remember that retaliation for reporting sex discrimination is prohibited under federal and local laws. Take a stand against the behavior so that your boss’s bosses know what’s happening.
  • Talk to a sexual harassment lawyer early. Don’t let ongoing workplace hostility chase you out of a job you love. An experienced discrimination attorney can help explain your options and push for changes in supervision and policy to protect you from future harassment.

Sexual harassment can happen in any office, no matter how big or how public. But you don’t have to suffer in silence. Contact our employment discrimination attorneys at Eisenberg & Baum LLC, to schedule a free consultation and let us help you find a way out.

The Effects of Sexual Harassment at Work

If you are facing sexual harassment at work, you know it’s about more than just an unwanted word or gesture. Sexual harassment causes all kinds of harmful effects that can damage your health, well-being, and career. Even if you aren’t directly the victim, the hostile workplace created by sexual harassment can have long-lasting effects.

In this blog post, I will discuss the emotional, physical, financial, and systemic effects of sexual harassment at work. I will explain how sexual harassment affects more than just the targeted employee. I will also explain how connecting with an employment discrimination attorney early can help curb the effects of workplace discrimination.

What Counts as Sexual Harassment?

Federal civil rights laws prohibit employers from harassing a person because of that person’s sex. Sexual harassment can include unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, lewd jokes, sexual touching, and other verbal or physical harassment of a sexual nature. It also includes offensive remarks including stereotypes about a person’s sex in general.

To be enough to support a federal lawsuit, sexual harassment must result in an adverse employment decision. This can include being fired, or not hired, being passed over for promotion, receiving lower wages, or being assigned to worse shifts or duties than your coworkers. If there has been no adverse employment decision, then the pattern of sexual harassment must be so frequent or severe that it creates a hostile work environment.

Even before these standards are met, sexual harassment can have substantial effects on its victims and bystanders who witness the discrimination. If you are facing sexual harassment, here are some effects you can expect to see.

Emotional Effects of Sexual Harassment

According to the women’s law center, Equal Rights Advocates, 90 – 95% of sexually harassed women suffer from some form of debilitating stress reaction. This can include anxiety, depression, sleep disorders, lowered self-esteem, and sexual dysfunction. Some severe cases have even been tied to Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.

These emotional effects of sexual harassment can begin long before there is an actionable sexual harassment claim. Often, these emotional harms put pressure on employees to “play along” with workplace harassment. If they can’t, then the employees may choose to transfer positions or quit all together.

Physical Effects of Sexual Harassment

Often, the stressful toll of sexual harassment can have physical manifestations as well. The victims of sexual harassment often report weight loss or weight gain, loss of appetite, headaches, and nausea. When the physical effects of sexual harassment manifest in a workplace, it can cause a serious loss of productivity.

Financial Effects of Sexual Harassment

The victim of sexual harassment often has to take sick time or unpaid leave to manage the effects of the discriminatory behaviors, leaving more work to be done by other team members. When conditions fail to improve, the victims may be forced to make the difficult decision to quit. In other cases, the harasser makes the choice for them, firing the employee for failing to meet sexual expectations.

These losses add up. In one person’s life, the loss of employment, particularly if he or she is fired, can cause a cascade of financial problems that continue for years. An unfavorable termination may make it difficult for the sexual harassment victim to find job references or replacement employment.

Systemic Effects of Sexual Harassment

Sexual harassment doesn’t just hurt the person targeted for discrimination. Men and women alike can find their work affected by sexual harassment in the workplace. High turnover rates can put pressure on remaining employees to fill the gaps. Hostile workplaces can also be demoralizing on everyone, even bystanders who don’t share the person’s sexual identity.

Even beyond any given employer, the prevalence of sexual harassment against women, in particular, has a cumulative effect of preventing women from asserting themselves in the workplace and at the negotiating table. Those who identify with targeted classes, like women, gay, lesbian, and transgender employees, are less likely as a whole to go for a big promotion or seek a merit-based raise.

How a Sex Discrimination Attorney Can Help

When sexual harassment disrupts your workplace, it can feel like there is no where to turn. However, the experienced sex discrimination attorneys at Eisenberg & Baum, LLP, have strategies to fight back against sexual harassment. We can help you at several steps along the way:

  • Identify internal processes, including union complaints, that could remove the harasser or change company policy.
  • File a sexual harassment complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).
  • File a state or federal lawsuit for sex discrimination.

Using these steps, a sex discrimination attorney can help you recover from the effects of sexual harassment. Different levels of the process may entitle you to damages for lost wages, physical harm including medical expenses, emotional harm including distress, and financial losses. You may even be compensated for costs associated with finding a new job.

By getting a sexual harassment attorney involved early, you may be able to save your job and your health at the same time. We are often able to negotiate with an employer before filing a complaint to get the changes you need at work.

It all starts with a confidential consultation. By meeting with our sexual harassment attorneys, you can get help to fight against sexual harassment at your job. If you feel like your employer has created a hostile workplace, contact us. We’ll help create a strategy to file a sexual harassment complaint and get you the relief you need.

Who Can Sue for Sexual Harassment?

If your workplace is laced with sexual tension or you are being singled out because of your gender, you may feel like the only way out is through the courts. But sometimes it can be hard to tell if you would be eligible to file a private civil rights lawsuit. You may be wondering just who can sue for sexual harassment.

In this blog post I will review the sexual harassment and sex discrimination portions of Title VII of the U.S. Civil Rights Act. I will also look at how these federal laws protect various possible plaintiffs. Finally, I will compare the remedies of filing a private or class action lawsuit and lodging an EEOC complaint.

What Counts as Illegal Sexual Harassment?

Sexual harassment is prohibited by state and federal law. Under Title VII of the U.S. Civil Rights Act, it is unlawful for an employer to harass you because of your sex. “Sexual harassment” is a form of gender discrimination that can include unwelcome sexual advances or touching, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical harassment that is sexual in nature.

Harassment can also include offensive remarks about a person’s sex or gender expression. This is true even if the comments do not directly target the employee. For example, if a supervisor regularly makes comments about how “you can’t trust men,” or “women are never good at math,” that could be a form of sexual harassment.

Not every passing comment will rise to the level of a sexual harassment lawsuit, though. To be eligible to file a complaint your employer must have:

  • Based an employment decision on a person’s sex (this includes hiring, firing, promotion, wages, tasks or shift assignments), or
  • Allowed a pattern of offensive behavior so frequent or severe it creates a hostile work environment.

When teasing crosses the line into actionable harassment under the federal law may depend on your workplace and the normal demeanor of employees. The standard for a hostile work environment may be different in an office setting than on a construction site. Courts will look at whether a reasonable person would have been offended in a similar situation.

Can I Sue for Sexual Harassment If I Am a Man?

Anyone can file a lawsuit for sexual harassment, regardless of gender. Men and women both face harassment in the workplace, though sometimes it looks different depending on the sex stereotypes involved. For example, a man may be able to file a civil rights action if his employer regularly tells him to “man up” or refuses to assign him to tasks that “take a woman’s touch.”

Can I Sue if I Am the Same Sex as My Harasser?

Many people believe that a woman cannot be sexually harassed by a woman or a man by a man. That’s not true. It doesn’t matter who is performing the sexual harassment – man or woman – as long as the harassment is based on your sex. Similarly, you can sue for patterns of behavior by superiors, staff, coworkers, and even customers, depending on how your employer responds to complaints.

Can I Sue if I Am Gay?

Gay and lesbian employees face special challenges in the workplace. Until recently, there was no federal protection for sexual orientation discrimination. However, in recent years, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has begun to interpret Title VII to protect against sexual harassment based on sexual orientation. While some courts have refused to follow that interpretation, others are now willing to enforce Title VII’s prohibition against sexual harassment for the benefit of the LGBT community.

Can I Sue if I Am Trans*?

Gender identity issues and the inherent difference transgender people experience from sex stereotypes can often result in sexual harassment in the workplace. The U.S. Supreme Court and several federal courts have come to the defense of transgender employees, ruling that sexual harassment based on gender identity or gender expression are illegal under Title VII.

Can I Sue if I Am Paid Under the Table?

Undocumented workers and other cash employees can often feel trapped in a job that involves sexual harassment. Their employers may threaten to report them to the INS or the IRS if they file sexual harassment or discrimination complaints. While there are some risks involved, under the table employees are entitled to protection against sexual harassment and hostility in the workplace.

Getting Relief Through the EEOC Complaint or a Private Lawsuit

When sexual harassment happens, you have options in how to fight it. An employment discrimination attorney can help each step of the way, from filing a complaint with the EEOC or pursuing a private individual or class-action lawsuit.

Usually, a person who has a sexual harassment complaint will need to go through the EEOC administrative complaint process first, before filing a private lawsuit in federal court under the federal law. However, exceptions do exist. Your employee rights lawyer will help you decide whether any of those exceptions apply to you. Otherwise, an EEOC counselor will investigate your claim and attempt to negotiate a solution to your complaint. If you raised a valid complaint, but the EEOC cannot resolve it, it will issue a “right to sue” letter. At that point, your case can go in two directions:

EEOC Litigation

In some cases, the EEOC will elect to conduct litigation directly to get relief for the victims of sexual harassment and sex discrimination. This can result policy changes and monetary relief. But the agency’s resources are limited, and there are many valid sexual harassment complaints that they cannot represent.

Private Sexual Harassment Lawsuits

If the EEOC doesn’t take your case, or if you would prefer to have more control over your litigation, you can also file a private lawsuit, individually or on behalf of a class of people like you. If your lawsuit is successful, you will have access to several remedies:

  • Reinstatement to your job or an equivalent position;
  • Policy and training changes;
  • Back pay (times 3) for money you lost because of the discrimination;
  • Fringe benefits lost;
  • Emotional distress damages; and
  • Attorney fees and court costs.

Get Help Filing Your Sexual Harassment Lawsuit

A lack of resources should never prevent you from getting protection from sexual harassment. No matter who you are, our employment discrimination attorneys are here to help. If you feel like your employer is making your office or job site a hostile workplace, contact us. We’ll meet with you and help create a strategy to file a sexual harassment complaint and get you the relief you need.

The Bojangles Lawsuit: Sexual Harassment of a Transgender Employee

If you are one of the nearly 1.4 million Americans who identify as transgender or transsexual, finding and maintaining employment can be challenging. Many LGBT employees are afraid to come out at work. They are worried that their employers will fire them, discriminate against them, or make their workplace a hostile, and even dangerous, place to be. When that happens, it may be hard to know where to turn for protection against sexual harassment of a transgender employee.

In this blog post, I will review EEOC v. Bojangles, a lawsuit recently filed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) on behalf of a transgender employee. I will explain sex discrimination protections that are available to Trans* individuals. I will also review the cases that protect against discrimination based on sexual stereotypes.

The EEOC & Sexual Harassment of Trans* Employees

The EEOC interprets Title VII of the United States Civil Rights Act to protect transgender employees. Title VII does not explicitly state protection based on sexual orientation or gender identity, but the EEOC has read the law’s prohibitions against sex discrimination to apply regardless of gender expression. That includes protections against sexual harassment and retaliation against members of the Trans community.

Protection Against Sex Discrimination

If an employee, including a transsexual employee, has been discriminated against by an employer, he or she is entitled to protection and compensation. Employers are not allowed to treat a person unfavorably because of that person’s sex (including the failure to meet gender stereotypes). A worker may not be fired, passed over for a job or promotion, paid differently, or denied access to training or benefits on the basis of sex. All of this amounts to sex discrimination and is illegal under Title VII.

The law also protects against sexual harassment, including offensive remarks about a person’s sex, as long as they are severe enough to create a hostile work environment or result in an adverse employment decision. In addition, the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination in retaliation for filing a sex discrimination complaint, whether internally or through the EEOC.

EEOC v. Bojangles Restaurants, Inc.

Earlier this year, the EEOC took a stand against transgender sexual harassment by filing a lawsuit against Bojangles Restaurant Inc., in North Carolina. The complaint alleged that the restaurant violated federal law by subjecting a transgender employee to a hostile work environment and retaliating against her when she reported the sexual harassment.

The employee, whose legal name was Jonathan Wolfe, was a transgender woman working in Fayetteville, North Carolina. Wolfe identifies and presents as a woman. While on the job, Wolfe’s employers demanded that she act and dress in ways that are stereotypically male, based on the sex she was assigned at birth. Wolfe reported her manager and assistant managers’ belittling comments on at least two occasions, without results. Wolfe was then fired in retaliation shortly after filing her last complaint.

The EEOC has taken the position that Bojangles’s demands and firing were sex discrimination and sexual harassment in violation of Title VII. After trying to reach an out-of-court resolution, the agency has sued the company for back pay, compensatory damages, and punitive damages. In a statement, Lynette Barns, regional attorney for the EEOC’s Charlotte District said:

“All employees have the right to work in an environment free from sexual harassment and gender stereotypes. . . . Federal law provides transgender employees protection from sex discrimination in the workplace.”

Courts Agree: Transgender Workers Are Protected

The United States Supreme Court has held that employment discrimination based on sex stereotypes is prohibited by Title VII. In 1989, the court decided Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989). There, an employee was passed over for promotion because her employer felt she needed to walk, talk, and dress more femininely. The court said that Title VII’s prohibition against sex discrimination includes the “entire spectrum of disparate treatment of men and women resulting from sex stereotypes.” (quoting City of Los Angeles Dep’t of Water & Power v. Manhart, 435 U.S. 702, 707 n.13 (1978) (internal citation omitted)).

A decade later, in 1998, the Supreme Court decided Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, 523 U.S. 75 (1998). That case, involving a lesbian employee, said that Title VII’s protections “must extend to [sex-based] discrimination of any kind that meets the statutory requirements.”

This includes when transgender workers are treated differently or sanctioned because they do not present according to their employer’s gender-based expectations. While the Supreme Court has never ruled specifically on a gender identity discrimination case, several lower courts have supported the EEOC’s interpretation of Title VII. They have found that several issues specific to the Trans* community are covered by the Civil Rights Act. For example:

  • In GG. ex rel Grimm v. Gloucester, __ F.3d __, 2016 WL 1567467 (4th Cir. Apr. 19, 2016), a U.S. Court of Appeals held that schools must provide students access to restrooms according to their gender identity.
  • In Glenn v. Brumby, 663 F.3d 1312 (11th Cir. 2011), a circuit court said that a person is considered transgender “precisely because of the perception that his or her behavior transgresses gender stereotypes.”
  • In Smith v. City of Salem, 378 F.3d 566 (6th Cir. 2004), a circuit court found sex discrimination when an employee was suspended based on her feminine appearance during her transition from male to female.
  • In Barnes v. City of Cincinnati, 401 F.3d 729 (6th Cir. 2005), the court ruled that sex discrimination occurred when a person presenting as male on duty, but living as a woman off duty was demoted based on a reputation as a “cross-dresser” and gender expression.

Get Help Defending Against Transgender Sex Discrimination

There is growing legal support for the position that a transgender person has the right to be free from sexual harassment based on his or her gender identity or expression. If your workplace has turned hostile because you do not fit traditional gender norms, the employment discrimination attorneys at Eisenberg & Baum can help. We have been fighting against employers who mistreat their employees for years, and we are committed to making our office a safe space for you and your loved ones. If you feel like your employer is using your gender identity against you, contact us. We’ll meet with you and help create a strategy that protects you and your rights.

​Can a Woman Sexually Harass Another Woman?

When we talk about sexual harassment in the workplace, we often talk in terms of men harassing women. It may be the example that first comes to your mind when we say “sexual harassment,” and it is the example we use most often when discussing the topic. But does that mean the law prohibits only men from sexually harassing women? Not at all. In fact, the law has been interpreted to prohibit sexual harassment by men and women against people of the same and opposite gender.

In today’s posting we’ll talk about how the law on sexual harassment has been applied to situations where both the harasser and victim are the same gender. If you have questions about your own sexual harassment case, please contact Eisenberg & Baum. We’re based in New York City and have attorneys licensed in many states throughout the country; we can also become admitted pro hac vice with local counsel in other states where we are not currently admitted, so we likely can help you understand your sexual harassment case no matter where you are.

The Development of Same-Sex Sexual Harassment Law

We’ve noted before that many federal, state and local laws prohibit sexual harassment in the workplace on the grounds that such harassment is considered gender discrimination. The federal law that has been interpreted to prohibit sexual harassment in the workplace is Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Though we often cite this law as prohibiting sexual harassment, the words “sexual harassment” don’t actually appear in the text of the law. Instead, Title VII states more broadly, “[i]t shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer . . . to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s … sex… .” The concept of sexual harassment as a form of sex discrimination developed over time after the enactment of Title VII as more women entered the workplace and the women’s liberation movement gained political and legal strength. The first United States Supreme Court decision acknowledging sexual harassment as a legal cause of action under Title VII came in 1986 with the case of Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson. That case presented what would now be seen as a classic example of sexual harassment in which a female employee was coerced into participating in sexual acts by her male boss.

Over ten years after the Supreme Court’s decision in Meritor, the Supreme Court considered the question of whether Title VII could apply when the harasser and victim are the same gender. In that case, Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., a male worker on an offshore oil platform complained about the harassing conduct of several male co-workers who allegedly engaged in both verbal and physical sexual conduct with him. The Court noted that Title VII protects both men and women from discrimination based on their sex, and held that sexual harassment by someone of the same gender can be just as illegal as harassment by a member of the opposite sex.

Following the opinion in Oncale, the key issue in same-sex sexual harassment cases is whether the harassment occurred “because of” the victim’s gender. If for example, the victim can show that the harasser harassed only members of their own gender and not the opposite gender, a court could infer that the harassment was motivated by the victim’s gender. If, on the other hand, the evidence shows that the harasser treated both men and women in the workplace the same, equally harassing both, the victim could have difficulty showing that they were harassed because of their particular sex.

Examples of Same-Sex Sexual Harassment Cases

Since the Oncale decision, there have been a number of sexual harassment cases based on same-sex harassment. In March of this year, the EEOC, the federal agency in charge of enforcing Title VII, announced it filed a lawsuit against a wireless retailer, ABC Phones of North Carolina, Inc., based on same-sex sexual harassment. The EEOC alleges that a female sales associate with the company was sexually harassed by a female colleague. The victim reported the conduct, which included both inappropriate comments and touching, to her management, but the conduct continued. The EEOC is seeking damages on the victim’s behalf, and noted in a press release that “‘[s]exual harassment is illegal, regardless of whether the harasser is female or male, or the same or opposite gender as the victim.’”

In 2014, the EEOC reached a settlement with Wells Fargo Bank in a similar case. There, several female bank tellers complained that a female manager and a female co-worker had harassed them both verbally and physically. Among other things, the harassers in that case allegedly made sexually explicit comments and gestures to the female tellers, suggested they wear provocative clothing to work, and inappropriately touched them. Again, the victims in the case reported the harassment to their employer, but the harassment did not stop. Wells Fargo settled the case with the EEOC, agreeing to pay the victims $290,000 in damages and to take preventative steps to avoid similar situations in the future.

You Don’t Have to Tolerate Sexual Harassment by Anyone

Sexual harassment can be committed by almost anyone in the workplace, male or female, manager, co-worker or customer. Women can sexually harass other women and men can sexually harass other men. If you believe you are being sexually harassed at work, no matter who is harassing you, we encourage you to contact an attorney. The attorneys at Eisenberg & Baum have years of experience handling a wide variety of sexual harassment cases and are ready to help you. We offer free initial consultations for sexual harassment claims and bill on a contingent fee basis, so you won’t have to pay us unless we win or settle your case.

Clothing Maker FYC International to Pay $80,000 for Sexual Harassment of Women

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently announced a settlement with clothing manufacturer, FYC International. Though the Connecticut based clothing manufacturer has discontinued operations, the EEOC still held it accountable for what three female employees alleged was a hostile and sexually demeaning environment in its warehouses. The extensive allegations of sexual harassment brought by the female employees provide a textbook example of sexual harassment in the workplace and should serve as a warning for other employers and employees still maintaining a work environment where blatant sexual conduct toward women is normal.

In this posting we’ll discuss the allegations in the FYC case, the EEOC’s enforcement actions and the terms of the settlement in the case. If you’d like to talk with a lawyer about how sexual harassment laws and complaint processes might apply in your own case, please contact Eisenberg & Baum.

The Claims Against FYC International

The female warehouse employees who raised the claim against FYC alleged they were subjected to sexual harassment by their male warehouse manager and male co-workers since at least 2007. For those looking at the case from the outside, the allegations demonstrate many of the common sources and types of sexual harassment that can lead to a legal claim.

What is Sexual Harassment?

As we’ve discussed before, sexual harassment is a form of gender discrimination that exists when an employee is subjected to unwelcome sexual conduct that either creates a hostile work environment or is used a basis for employment decisions. In the FYC case, the female employees alleged that the sexually-oriented conduct of their manager and co-workers created a hostile work environment for them. For more background on hostile work environment claims, read our prior posting “What is a ‘Hostile Work Environment?’

Who Committed the Harassment?

Harassment in the workplace can come from any number of sources, including management, co-workers, clients and vendors. In the FYC case, the victims alleged that the harassment came from two sources, starting with the warehouse manager and then spreading to male co-workers. The manager is alleged to have created the environment at work that not only could have been alleged to be harassing on its own, but also apparently encouraged other employees to act in sexually offensive ways toward female employees.

How Were the Employees Harassed?

Sexual harassment can come in many different forms, from verbal to physical conduct. In the FYC case, the female employees alleged they were subjected to all types of unwanted sexual conduct which led to the hostile environment. The warehouse manager himself allegedly made comments about female employees’ bodies, propositioned them for sex, and grabbed and touched them. According to the complainants, other male employees followed the manager’s example by displaying pornographic photographs at work, making their own sexual remarks to female employees, and discussing sexual acts in the open. This combination of physical and verbal conduct from various levels of employees at the FYC warehouses created a discriminatory environment, according to female employees.

The EEOC Process

The employees took their complaint to the EEOC, the federal agency in charge of enforcing the federal law that prohibits gender discrimination in the workplace, Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964. In cases brought to the EEOC, the agency will often investigate and attempt to resolve the dispute between the parties. Where it finds the employer violated the law and the employer is unwilling to settle the case, the EEOC may decide to file a lawsuit directly against the employer on behalf of the employees.

In the FYC case, the EEOC investigated the claim and found reasonable cause to believe sexual harassment had occurred against female employees at FYC’s warehouses. The EEOC attempted to settle with FYC before bringing formal legal action, but the FYC rejected those attempts. In September 2014, the EEOC brought a lawsuit against FYC in federal court in Connecticut seeking both money damages for the employees and an injunction that would prohibit FYC from engaging in further sexual harassment of its employees.

Settlement Terms

With the real threat of a trial now facing it, FYC came to the negotiating table with the EEOC. In March of this year, the EEOC announced it had reached a settlement with the employer over the sexual harassment claims. Under the terms of the settlement, FYC will pay $80,000 in damages to the three female employees who raised the complaint with the EEOC. The EEOC also announced future protective measures FYC agreed to implement should it continue to do business, including hiring an independent compliance official, to ensure the incidents of sexual harassment stop.

You Have Legal Options

According to the female employees at FYC’s warehouses, they had been subjected to various forms of sexual harassment for over five years before they complained to the EEOC. The harassment may have started with the warehouse manager, but with this example from leadership, other men in the warehouse allegedly followed. Surrounded by this sexually explicit and aggressive behavior at all levels, the complainants could easily have come to accept this environment as a part of their job. They did not.

No matter who is harassing you at work and how long it has been going on, you can always seek legal help. If you believe you’ve been subjected to sexual harassment at work, please contact Eisenberg & Baum. Our attorneys have decades of experience handling sexual harassment cases in New York and are ready to help you with your claim. We offer free initial consultations for sexual harassment claims and bill on a contingent fee basis, so you won’t have to pay us unless we win or settle your case.

What Is Quid Pro Quo Sexual Harassment?

As if understanding the law isn’t hard enough, there are times when you have to speak Latin to understand what is going on. Because our legal system traces some of its roots back to ancient Rome, you’ll often come across Latin phrases in the law like caveat emptor, ex parte, and habeas corpus. In the employment discrimination law area, one of the most important Latin phrases to understand is “quid pro quo.” Quid pro quo translates roughly to “something for something,” and in the context of sexual harassment, it is used as a short-hand way of referring to those claims where employment decisions are conditioned on an employee’s submitting to sexually harassing conduct.

In today’s posting, we’ll talk about what a quid pro quo sexual harassment claim involves and provide a few examples of what these types of claims look like. If you’d like to understand more about these types of sexual harassment claims and how they might apply in your own case, please contact us.

Elements of a Quid Pro Quo Sexual Harassment Claim

As we’ve discussed in prior posts, sexual harassment is a form of gender discrimination that is illegal under federal law as well as many state and local laws. All sexual harassment claims involve some form of unwelcome sexual conduct. From there, sexual harassment claims typically fall into two categories: (1) hostile work environment claims and (2) quid pro quo claims. For more information about hostile work environment claims, check out our posting, “What is a ‘Hostile Work Environment’?”

In quid pro quo claims, a person in a supervisory capacity subjects an employee to unwanted sexual conduct in exchange for some beneficial employment action.

Who Is the Harasser in a Quid Pro Quo Claim?

The harasser in a quid pro quo claim typically must have some supervisory authority over the victim. Because the basis of a quid pro quo claim is that an employee is given some employment benefit in return for submitting to sexual conduct, the harasser must be someone who is in a position to provide that benefit to the employee. That’s not to say that sexual harassment by co-workers, contractors or customers can’t also create a legal claim, but those situations more often fall within the hostile work environment theory of sexual harassment.

What Type of Conduct is Involved in a Quid Pro Quo Claim?

The harasser in a quid pro quo sexual harassment claim must subject the victim to unwanted sexual conduct. The key pieces to this element are that the conduct must have been of a sexual nature and must have been unwanted by the victim. The conduct can be verbal or physical, with a supervisor subjecting the employee to anything from offensive jokes to physical groping and sexual acts in return for some beneficial employment action.

Whether the conduct was unwanted is determined by the facts around the harassment, and specifically courts will look at the victim’s own conduct during the time of the harassment. Even if the victim ultimately participated in the act, it can still be considered unwanted depending on the employee’s other actions surrounding the event, including whether the employee objected to the conduct either directly to the harasser or otherwise through their employer.

What Types of Employment Actions Are Typically Taken?

As part of a quid pro quo sexual harassment claim, the supervisor must have conditioned a job benefit or made an employment decision based on the victim’s submission to or rejection of the unwanted sexual conduct. Examples of the types of employment actions typically involved in a quid pro quo claim include hiring, firing, promotions, demotions, and decisions about compensation. The supervisor does not have to explicitly offer the employment benefit at the time of the harassing conduct, so long as the facts show that an employee’s acceptance or rejection of the sexual conduct was later used as part of the employment decision.

Examples of Quid Pro Quo Sexual Harassment

Quid pro quo claims can arise any time, starting with hiring decisions and ending with termination. For example, a job candidate could come in for an interview with the head of the department in which she would be working, and during the interview, the department head proceeds to grope the candidate and ask her “How badly do you want this job?”

Next, take the example of an employee who has been continually subjected by her supervisor to remarks about her body and sexual jokes. The employee tells her supervisor to stop and has reported his actions up the chain. When it comes time for annual performance reviews and promotions, the supervisor gives the employee a bad review and passes her over for promotion because she did not “play along” with him.

Another example could be an employee on a business trip with his supervisor. While staying at the same hotel, the supervisor comes to his room to talk about a presentation they are preparing to give but quickly starts making sexual advances on the employee. The employee steps away from his boss and asks her to leave his room. The supervisor responds, “Come on. I’d hate to see you lose your job.”

The employees in each of these examples could have a quid pro quo sexual harassment claim against their employer, though the incidents happened at different times in the employment process, in different places, and with differing degrees of explicitness on the part of the supervisor.

Contact an Attorney

If you suspect you’ve been the victim of quid pro quo sexual harassment, we encourage you to contact an attorney immediately. Quid pro quo cases often are not as clear as the examples above, and it can take an experienced sexual harassment attorney to help you understand the strength of your claims and your legal options. At Eisenberg & Baum, our attorneys have decades of experience handling sexual harassment cases in New York and are ready to help you with your claim. We offer free initial consultations for sexual harassment claims and bill on a contingent fee basis, so you won’t have to pay us unless we win or settle your case.

Employee Lawsuit Against Memphis Cheddar’s Settled for $450,000

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently settled a sexual harassment lawsuit against Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC, franchisee of a Cheddar’s restaurant in Memphis, Tennessee. The allegations in the lawsuit reflect a reality in the restaurant industry that, unfortunately, is all too common. According to a report released in 2014 by The Restaurant Opportunities Centers United and Forward Together, “sexual harassment in restaurants is widespread and is experienced by all types of workers.” The report was based on a survey of 688 current and former restaurant workers across 39 states who were asked questions about their experience with sexual conduct at work. Roughly two-thirds of female respondents reported having experienced some form of sexual harassment by management. The survey further found that incidents of sexual harassment by co-workers and customers were even higher.

The EEOC’s case against the Memphis Cheddar’s franchise is indicative of the many charges it receives each year from restaurant workers. In this posting, we’ll summarize the allegations in the EEOC’s case against the Cheddar’s franchise and the terms of the parties’ settlement. If you’ve experienced sexual harassment at work and would like to discuss your legal options, please contact Eisenberg & Baum. We have an experienced group of New York sexual harassment attorneys who are ready to help and advocate on your behalf.

The EEOC’s Allegations

The EEOC’s lawsuit, filed in federal court in Tennessee, alleged that female employees of the Cheddar’s restaurant had been subjected to a hostile work environment through sexual harassment by management. Sexual harassment is a form of gender discrimination and a violation of Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act. As we discussed in our prior blog posting, “What is a ‘Hostile Work Environment’?,” a hostile work environment is a type of employment discrimination claim often used in sexual harassment cases. In order to prove a sexual harassment claim based on a hostile work environment, an employee must show they experienced unwelcome sexual conduct and that the conduct was so severe or pervasive it affected the terms of their employment.

In the Cheddar’s case, the EEOC brought the hostile work environment claim on behalf of the alleged victims, contending that the restaurant allowed managers to subject female employees to a number of different types of sexual conduct, including touching, requests for sexual favors and inappropriate comments. Though the restaurant apparently had a sexual harassment policy in place, the EEOC indicated it failed to properly enforce that policy when female employees complained about the inappropriate conduct.

Terms of the Settlement

In February, the EEOC announced it had reached a settlement with the Cheddar’s franchise. The restaurant agreed to pay $450,000 in damages to 15 individuals. In addition, the restaurant agreed to take affirmative steps to address the work environment in its restaurant, including:

  • conducting sexual harassment training,
  • maintaining workplace cameras,
  • monitoring workplace behavior,
  • notifying its employees of the settlement, and
  • reporting future sexual harassment incidents to the EEOC for three years.

This mixture of monetary damages and affirmative relief is standard in many EEOC settlements, as it helps both remedy damage done to victims and avoid future incidents. To learn more about the types of remedies that can be available in sexual harassment cases, check out our prior posting, “What Are My Remedies if I Sue for Discrimination at My Job?”

Get Legal Help

Working in a restaurant environment can be hard, made only harder by sexual harassment from managers, coworkers and customers. If you’ve been the victim of sexual harassment at your job, please contact us. We can discuss the merits of your case and advise you on the next steps, whether that is filing a charge with the EEOC or pursuing other legal options. We offer free initial consultations for sexual harassment claims and bill on a contingent fee basis, so you won’t have to pay us unless we win or settle your case.

The Takeaway: Kesha’s Sexual Harassment Lawsuit

Singer/songwriter Kesha has been in a fight for the last couple of years trying to free herself of her recording contract with Sony Music because of an alleged sexually abusive relationship with her longtime producer, Lukasz Gottwald (aka Dr. Luke). The fight has been taking place in the legal system as well as in public, where hundreds of thousands of supporters have joined the #FreeKesha movement on Twitter and through online petitions, urging Sony to end its contract with the singer to allow her to move on and begin recording music again. Despite the outpouring of support, Kesha’s legal case has suffered a series of setbacks recently with a New York Supreme Court judge denying her the ability to get out of her recording contract and dismissing her claims against Dr. Luke and Sony in New York. Kesha’s legal options are not spent at this point, though. She still has a pending case in California that could now go forward and she could appeal the New York Supreme Court’s dismissal.

Regardless of the eventual outcome of her high profile case, Kesha’s claims can be relatable for many women in the workplace. In her lawsuit against Sony and Dr. Luke, she alleged a history of sexual assault and intimidation by her producer that has left her unable to work with him or her label any more. This environment allegedly left Kesha scared for herself and her career and thus reluctant to report the abuse to anyone. Though the New York court may not have found in Kesha’s favor, her allegations shed light on a broader set of questions for victims of sexual harassment in the workplace. We’ll discuss the options employees have to stop sexual harassment at work and ultimately get out of a poisonous employment relationship if necessary.

Report Sexual Harassment

Kesha alleges the incidents of sexual assault and harassment by her producer started ten years ago, though she did not file her original lawsuit until 2014. A victim’s reluctance to step forward with their claim is certainly understandable. The harasser can be intimidating both mentally and physically and the employee could have legitimate concerns about retaliation by their employer up to and including termination. However, delaying reporting harassment can have a significant impact on your ability to not only stop the harassment but recover any damages you may have suffered. In general, the closer to the actual harassment your claim is, the fresher the events will be in your mind and the minds of any witnesses. Also, if you choose to pursue a legal claim for sexual harassment, your claim will be subject to statutes of limitations, or deadlines, that you might miss if you wait too long to speak up. One of the reasons cited by the New York court for dismissing Kesha’s claims was the statute of limitations.

Many employers have a process for employees to report sexual harassment, which we encourage employees to follow. A responsible employer will take a sexual harassment claim seriously and investigate it without bias and with the intent of stopping any illegal behavior as quickly as possible. Where it finds sexual harassment occurred, the employer should also take all necessary steps to repair the damage done to the victim and ensure the harassment does not continue, including terminating the harasser where warranted.

Understand Your Legal Options

If your employer fails to adequately address your sexual harassment claim, you’re going to need legal help. We suggest you reach out to a lawyer as soon as possible, even if your employer is investigating your claim, to ensure that you know about all of your legal options and that you are fully protected.

When an employer fails to address a victim’s sexual harassment claims, the victim can feel trapped. Know, however that an experienced sexual harassment attorney can help you get out of a harassing work environment and recover damages you’ve suffered, even when your employer has failed to help. Kesha filed a lawsuit not only against her alleged abuser but also against her record label seeking to end her recording contract early because of the alleged sexual abuse she suffered. Though Kesha’s relationship with Sony Music is not an employment relationship, her legal claim does provide an example of what an employee in a similar situation might seek in a lawsuit if their employer has not addressed their sexual harassment claim.

Victims of sexual harassment at work can seek injunctive relief from courts as part of the remedy for the discrimination they suffered. The injunctive relief could include orders as broad as prohibiting an employer from engaging in further sexual harassment. Also, most employees are considered “at will” employees who can resign for any reason or no reason at all, some employees are subject to an employment contract that dictates the terms under which they can resign from their job. If you do happen to be working under such a contract and are a victim of sexual harassment, you could seek a court order allowing you to terminate the contract early. This option may not be available in every instance, but an experienced lawyer can help explain your remedies and pursue them for you where it makes sense. To learn more about a discrimination victim’s legal remedies, you can read our prior blog post entitled “What Are My Remedies if I Sue for Discrimination at My Job?”

Contact Us

If you’ve been the victim of sexual abuse or harassment at work and would like to talk with someone about your claims and the remedies available to you, please contact Eisenberg & Baum. We can help you determine the best approach for your claim and help you understand how you can put an end to the harassment while limiting any damage to your career. Though we’re based in New York City, we have attorneys licensed in many states throughout the country and we can also seek to become admitted pro hac vice with local counsel in other states where we are not currently admitted, so we likely can help no matter where you are. We offer free initial consultations for sexual harassment claims and bill on a contingent fee basis, so you won’t have to pay us unless we win or settle your case.

Statute of Limitations for Sexual Harassment Claims

If you’ve been the victim of sexual harassment, you might be hesitant to raise the issue at work or pursue a legal claim. Speaking up against your harasser can be intimidating and, even though retaliation is illegal, you might have legitimate concerns about facing reprisals from your employer. There are very good reasons for speaking up, though, not the least of which is to put an end to illegal harassment. From a legal standpoint, you should also be aware that you only have a certain amount of time to raise your sexual harassment claim. If you wait too long, it may be too late to file a legal claim.

In this posting, we’ll talk about the time limits, or “Statutes of Limitations,” for filing sexual harassment claims at the federal level as well as in New York State and New York City. We’ll also talk about what happens if you miss those deadlines. If you’d like to understand more about how the statute of limitations applies to a claim you’re considering, please contact Eisenberg & Baum.

Filing Claims with Federal and State Administrative Agencies

Sexual harassment is a form of gender discrimination and is prohibited under Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 as well as the New York State Human Rights Law. New York City has also adopted its own law prohibiting sexual harassment. Each of these laws is enforced by a designated government agency: the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) for the federal law, the New York State Division of Human Rights for New York state law, and the New York City Commission on Human Rights for New York City’s law. A victim of sexual harassment has the option of filing an administrative claim with one of these agencies, depending on where the harassment occurred, but must be aware of time limits in place with each agency.

EEOC Claims

Sexual harassment victims can pursue a Title VII claim by filing a “Charge of Discrimination” with the EEOC. Where, as in New York, there is a state or local administrative agency that enforces a similar state or local law, sexual harassment charges must generally be filed with the EEOC within 300 calendar days of the date the harassment occurred. The 300 days is calculated including weekends and holidays, though the final day of the time period is pushed to the closest business day if it would otherwise fall on a weekend or holiday. The EEOC also notes that they generally will not extend this deadline while you attempt to resolve your complaint through your employer’s internal grievance process. So, even if your employer is already investigating your complaint, it is still very important that you reach out to an attorney to consider your potential EEOC charge because the statute of limitations may already be running.

New York State and New York City Administrative Claims

The New York State Division of Human Rights and New York City Commission on Human Rights have slightly longer deadlines for submitting sexual harassment claims under the laws they help enforce. You have a full year from the date of the event of harassment to file a complaint with either of these agencies.

Filing Claims in Court

Victims of sexual harassment can also pursue their claims in federal or state court, where another set of deadlines applies depending on whether you’re pursuing your claim under federal or state law.

Federal Cases

In order to bring a lawsuit for violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, you must first file a charge with the EEOC. Assuming you met the deadline requirement for filing an EEOC charge we discussed above, the EEOC will investigate your claim, attempt to mediate a resolution in some instances, and typically issue you a “Notice of Right to Sue” after completing its process. If you want to go forward with a lawsuit at that point, you must file it within 90 days of receiving the Notice of Right to Sue from the EEOC.

New York Cases

Unlike a federal claim, you do not have to first file a complaint with a state or local enforcement agency before filing a lawsuit based on New York law. The statute of limitations for filing a sexual harassment lawsuit under New York State law and New York City law is the same: you have three years from the date of the harassment. This longer window of time can be a benefit to those victims who may have missed the deadline for filing a harassment complaint with one of the administrative enforcement agencies.

How Do I Calculate My Deadline if There Were Multiple Instances of Harassment?

Your deadline for filing an administrative complaint or a lawsuit is typically calculated from the date the sexual harassment occurred. Often times, though, sexual harassment is a recurring problem that occurs over a period of time. In those cases, your deadline for filing may be calculated from the last instance of harassment but to be safe, we calendar the deadline from the date of the first instance of harassment.

Don’t Wait, Get Legal Help

Whatever venue you choose, missing your filing deadline could result in your losing the ability to recover damages for your sexual harassment claim. As a victim of sexual harassment in New York, you have several options for pursuing your claim, so even if you have missed one deadline for filing a claim, it’s possible you still have the ability to pursue your claim with another agency or in court. You may also have other legal claims you can pursue, which may be subject to different statutes of limitations.

Given the relatively short deadlines victims of sexual harassment can have in filing claims (particularly with administrative enforcement agencies), the complexity of calculating those deadlines and the various venues in which victims can pursue their claims, we recommend sexual harassment victims contact an attorney as soon as possible after being harassed to understand their legal options and make a fully informed decision on how they should pursue their claim. Eisenberg & Baum’s attorneys have decades of experience handling sexual harassment cases in New York and are ready to help you with your claim. We offer free initial consultations for sexual harassment claims and bill on a contingent fee basis, so you won’t have to pay us unless we win or settle your case.